18F-FDG-PET/CT angiography in the diagnosis of infective endocarditis and cardiac device infection in adult patients with congenital heart disease and prosthetic material.

OBJECTIVES: Infective endocarditis (IE) and cardiac device infection (CDI) are a major complication in the growing number of patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) reaching adulthood. We aimed to evaluate the added value of 18F-FDG-PET/CT angiography (PET/CTA) in the diagnosis of IE-CDI in adults with CHD and intravascular or intracardiac prosthetic material, in whom echocardiography (ECHO) and modified Duke Criteria (DC) have limitations because of the patients' complex anatomy. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted in a referral center with multidisciplinary IE and CHD Units. PET/CTA and ECHO findings were compared in consecutive adult (≥18years) patients with CHD who have prosthetic material and suspected IE-CDI. The initial diagnosis using the DC and the diagnosis with the additional PET/CTA data (DC+PET/CTA) were compared with the final diagnostic consensus established by an expert team at three months. RESULTS: Between November-2012 and April-2017, 25 patients (15 men; median age 40years) were included. Cases were initially classified as definite in 8 (32%), possible in 14 (56%) and rejected in 3 (12%). DC+PET/CTA allowed reclassification of 12/14 (86%) cases initially identified as possible IE. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of DC at IE suspicion were 39.1%/83.3%/90.4%/25.5%/61.2%, respectively. The diagnostic performance increased significantly with addition of PET/CTA data: 87%/83.3%/95.4%/61.5%/85.1%, respectively. PET/CTA also provided an alternative diagnosis in 3 patients with rejected IE, and detected pulmonary embolisms in 3 patients. CONCLUSIONS: PET/CTA was a useful diagnostic tool in the complex group of adult patients with CHD who have cardiac or intravascular prosthetic material and suspected IE or CDI, providing added diagnostic value to the modified DC (increased sensitivity) and improving case classification.

Improving the Diagnosis of Infective Endocarditis in Prosthetic Valves and Intracardiac Devices With 18F-Fluordeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Angiography: Initial Results at an Infective Endocarditis Referral Center.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of infective endocarditis (IE) in prosthetic valves and intracardiac devices is challenging because both the modified Duke criteria (DC) and echocardiography have limitations in this population. The added value of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) and (18)F-FDG PET/CT angiography (PET/CTA) was evaluated in this complex scenario at a referral center with a multidisciplinary IE unit. METHODS AND RESULTS: Ninety-two patients admitted to our hospital with suspected prosthetic valve or cardiac device IE between November 2012 and November 2014 were prospectively included. All patients underwent echocardiography and PET/CT, and 76 had cardiac CTA. PET/CT and echocardiography findings were evaluated and compared, with concordant results in 54% of cases (κ=0.23). Initial diagnoses with DC at admission, PET/CT, and DC+PET/CT were compared with the final diagnostic consensus reached by the IE Unit. DC+PET/CT enabled reclassification of 90% of cases initially classified as possible IE with DC and provided a conclusive diagnosis (definite/rejected) in 95% of cases. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were 52%, 94.7%, 92.9%, and 59.7% for DC; 87%, 92.1%, 93.6%, and 84.3% for PET/CT; and 90.7%, 89.5%, 92%, and 87.9% for DC+PET/CT. Use of PET/CTA yielded even better diagnostic performance values than PET/nonenhanced CT (91%, 90.6%, 92.8%, and 88.3% versus 86.4%, 87.5%, 90.2%, and 82.9%) and substantially reduced the rate of doubtful cases from 20% to 8% (P<0.001). DC+PET/CTA reclassified an additional 20% of cases classified as possible IE with DC+PET/nonenhanced CT. In addition, PET/CTA enabled detection of a significantly larger number of anatomic lesions associated with active endocarditis than PET/nonenhanced CT (P=0.006) or echocardiography (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: (18)F-FDG PET/CT improves the diagnostic accuracy of the modified DC in patients with suspected IE and prosthetic valves or cardiac devices. PET/CTA yielded the highest diagnostic performance and provided additional diagnostic benefits.

Non-obstructive prosthetic heart valve thrombosis (NOPVT): Really a benign entity?

AIMS: To assess the effectiveness of different treatment strategies in patients with non-obstructive prosthetic valve thrombosis (NOPVT) during hospitalization and long-term follow-up. METHODS: NOPVT was diagnosed by transesophageal echocardiography. Resolution was defined as the disappearance or reduction of the thrombus under anticoagulation. All cases were first managed with optimization of anticoagulation. At discharge, patients received oral anticoagulation (OAC) alone or OAC and antiplatelet therapy (double treatment). Adverse events were defined as cardiovascular death, recurrence, thromboembolic events or major bleeding. RESULTS: From 1997 to 2012, 47 patients (mean age: 65years; women: 60%) were diagnosed with NOPVT (mitral valve: 97%). Previous poor anticoagulation control was documented in 66% of patients. Twenty-one patients (45%) were treated with unfractionated heparin (UFH), especially those with thrombus size >10mm (19/21). Optimization of OAC was performed in the remaining patients. Treatment failed in 13 (27.6%) patients, mostly in those who received UFH (10/13), requiring surgery (53.8%) or fibrinolysis (30.7%). Forty-two patients survived and, at discharge, 44% of patients received OAC alone and 56% the double treatment. At follow-up (median 23months; range 0.03-116months), 59.5% of patients presented cardiovascular events, however no differences in outcome were observed with double treatment or OAC alone (p=0.385). CONCLUSIONS: NOPVT is a high-risk complication, not only during hospitalization but also during follow-up. Optimization of anticoagulation is efficient in most patients except in thrombi ≥10mm treated with UFH. The double treatment does not prevent adverse events or complications during follow-up.

Relation of ST-segment elevation before and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty to left ventricular area at risk, myocardial infarct size, and systolic function.

Electrocardiography is an excellent tool for decision making in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, little is known on the correlation between its dynamic changes during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and the anatomic information provided by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. The study aimed to assess the predictive value of dynamic ST-segment changes before and after PCI on myocardial area at risk (AAR), infarct size, and left ventricular function in patients with STEMI. Eighty-five consecutive patients with a first STEMI were included. An electrocardiogram was recorded before and after PCI at 1, 24, 48, 72, and 120 hours. Sum of ST elevation (sumSTE), the number of STE, and STE resolution (resSTE) were determined. Complete resSTE was defined as ≥70% resolution, and patients were classified into 3 groups: group 1 (resSTE 1 hour after PCI) n = 39; group 2 (resSTE 120 hour after PCI) n = 27; and group 3, without resSTE (n = 19). Cardiovascular magnetic resonance was performed during hospitalization and at 6 months. Left ventricular volumes, ejection fraction, AAR, infarct size, myocardial salvage index, and microvascular obstruction were determined. Before PCI, the number of STE and sumSTE were best associated with AAR (p <0.001). After PCI, lack of resSTE (group 3) was associated with larger infarct size, MVO, and lower myocardial salvage index. However, sumSTE at 120 hours after PCI best discriminated patients with larger infarct size, ventricular volumes, and lower ejection fraction during hospitalization and at follow-up. In conclusion, admission sumSTE best correlates with AAR, whereas sumSTE at 120 hours rather than early resSTE best correlates with infarct size and left ventricular volumes during hospitalization and at 6 months.